Skip to main content

The cultural aspect of Agile & DevOps transformation

I get a lot of request for “help” for  agile and DevOps transformation. Many sincerely want to do this but many do this because everyone else is doing and they contacted some some consultants who gave them their marketing pitch with all the technical jargon and modern buzzwords. 

There is a lot of hype around DevOps and most of the consultant companies I interacted had many nice slide decks with lot of keywords but implementing them was very difficult.

Adding "Ops" at the end of any normal technical word doesn't turn it into the next stage of DevOps. The team and company needs many years of practice and rigor before they can master the trade. Until you create a team/company which is interested in reducing the overall cycle time  and who is wiling to take the feedback and act on it don't think about ChatOps, DevSecOps, DataOps and a lot of other xOps. These ops jargon looks good on power point slides but in reality these are just common sense, the next thing you do as part of DevOps transformation.  The key objective of Agile or DevOps is to reduce the cycle time , to get frequent feedback and act on it.
Agile & DevOps - A collaborative team effort from start to finish

I have lot of presentation/artifacts for DevOps. Most of these are customized according to the need and the objective of the team/application. In my experience helping many teams to do Agile and DevOps  I found that the technical part of DevOps is only around 30-40 % and the rest 60-70 % is the cultural change. It takes  many months and sometimes years of agile transformation before many teams could really start planning for DevOps.

Your team should be willing to do frequent releases (daily, weekly or at least monthly)  and act on the feedback received. If you prefer to work only in silos then Agile & DevOps is not for you. Many teams just do the build automation and forget the people part. It is more difficult to change people, to push them out of their comfort zone. The business analysts , developers, testers, Ops - everyone will (and should) work together to deliver product. For this to happen people should start thinking about the larger picture  and not on the small personal roles and responsibilities. Based on my experience this is the most difficult part 

If you are starting the transformation journey , I will not suggest a big bang transformation. Most of the time such transformation will end up in failure. My suggestion is to make gradual changes keeping the long-term objective in mind. 

Do these in small cycles 

  1. Plan for the small increment of changes, 
  2. Make the planned changes
  3. Collect data/observe the impact of change
  4. Identity next steps or areas of improvement 

With every cycle you will have improved your delivery pipeline

Some of these changes could be technology related  but most of them will be related to people, process and coordination. There is no silver bullet  which can solve all your problems. You will have to identify each bottleneck and solve them. Experienced coaches can guide in this transformation but they cannot solve your problems with flashy power point presentations. They need your help to help you.


Popular posts from this blog

PDCA & SCRUM (or Agile); Why is it important?

The PDCA (Plan DO Check Act) cycle was made popular by Dr. W. Edwards Deming. This is a scientific cyclic process which can be used to improve the process (or product). This is cyclic in nature and usually time boxed. Plan  This is the first stage of the process. During this step the team discusses the objectives, the process and the clear conditions of exit (conditions of acceptance). This stage sets the measurable and achievable goals for the team. DO Team works together to achieve the objective set in the planning phase. Team works with the set of agreed process. Check Once the implantation is done team regroups and verifies the output and compares it to the agreed conditions of acceptance decided during the planning phase. The deviation, if any, is noted down. ACT If any deviation in planned tasks is observed during the Check stage, a root cause analysis is conducted. Team brainstorms and identifies the changes required to prevent such deviations in future. Team also

Product Backlog: Should you write everything in user story format?

I like user stories a lot. They help everyone talk the same language and results in a better product. User story alone does not constitute product requirement. User story is supposed to be a place holder for discussion which should happen between the team, Product Owner and the customer. This discussion result in a common understanding which along with the user story content is the product requirement. This format captures the essence of requirement without confusing the readers User Story is only one of the many different ways in which requirements can be represented. This is not mandatory in any Agile “process”. But many have made this mandatory. I have seen many spending countless hours trying to write the requirements in user story format when they could have easily written that in simple one-line sentence in few minutes.   I have seen team members refusing to even discuss the requirement until product owner rewrote the requirement in user story format. Once I

Why is potentially shippable product quality important

Agile teams work in iterations. During this period, they are supposed to work on product increments which can be “delivered” at the end of iteration. But how you know that the correct product was delivered? Many teams have different kinds of acceptance criteria and Definition of Done (DoD). But in many cases, this “done” is not the real “done” there might be some testing pending, some integration or review pending or anything else which prevents the actual use of the product increment. Many of these teams will need additional iterations to finish hardening their products. Many teams will implement different types of “gates” or approval steps to move to next stage. The free flow of product will be interrupted. They might end up doing mini waterfall within their agile process. Many don’t even realize this. This results in poor quality and requires additional effort to “harden” the product. Potentially Shippable Product increment The acceptance criteria and DoD should be modified