Scrum : How to accommodate the infrastructure tasks at the beginning of the project?

Anu is a new scrum master. After the project kick off meeting on further discussion she realized that for a successful delivery as a pre-requisite the team needs a lot of infrastructure work to be completed. PO wanted the feature development work to start as soon as possible. Team had serious concerns about the delivery if they start the actual work without the required infrastructure.

What can be done in this situation?

I met with Anu and we agreed on the following

Identify the most critical requirements required for the team to start work. Do a casual analysis with the subject matter expert and the team and find the cost (duration + software + hardware costs) of doing (and not doing)

Anu held meetings with the team, PO & other stakeholders. This teamwork produced a wonderful infrastructure backlog and was presented to PO. She also added the dependency to this backlog. Nice to have infrastructure were at lower priority. This infrastructure work was added to the first two sprints. Team was also asked to do a sample application integrating all the infrastructure work as part of sprint backlog. With this sample application team validated the infrastructure configuration. The other infrastructure woke like server to do load testing; performance profiling was added to the middle sprints.

Comments

PDCA & SCRUM (or Agile); Why is it important?

The PDCA (Plan DO Check Act) cycle was made popular by Dr. W. Edwards Deming. This is a scientific cyclic process which can be used to improve the process (or product). This is cyclic in nature and usually time boxed. Plan This is the first stage of the process. During this step the team discusses the objectives, the process and the clear conditions of exit (conditions of acceptance). This stage sets the measurable and achievable goals for the team. DO Team works together to achieve the objective set in the planning phase. Team works with the set of agreed process. Check Once the implantation is done team regroups and verifies the output and compares it to the agreed conditions of acceptance decided during the planning phase. The deviation, if any, is noted down. ACT If any deviation in planned tasks is observed during the Check stage, a root cause analysis is conducted. Team brainstorms and identifies the changes required to prevent such deviations in future. Team also

Product Backlog: Should you write everything in user story format?

I like user stories a lot. They help everyone talk the same language and results in a better product. User story alone does not constitute product requirement. User story is supposed to be a place holder for discussion which should happen between the team, Product Owner and the customer. This discussion result in a common understanding which along with the user story content is the product requirement. This format captures the essence of requirement without confusing the readers User Story is only one of the many different ways in which requirements can be represented. This is not mandatory in any Agile “process”. But many have made this mandatory. I have seen many spending countless hours trying to write the requirements in user story format when they could have easily written that in simple one-line sentence in few minutes. I have seen team members refusing to even discuss the requirement until product owner rewrote the requirement in user story format. Once I

Why is potentially shippable product quality important

Agile teams work in iterations. During this period, they are supposed to work on product increments which can be “delivered” at the end of iteration. But how you know that the correct product was delivered? Many teams have different kinds of acceptance criteria and Definition of Done (DoD). But in many cases, this “done” is not the real “done” there might be some testing pending, some integration or review pending or anything else which prevents the actual use of the product increment. Many of these teams will need additional iterations to finish hardening their products. Many teams will implement different types of “gates” or approval steps to move to next stage. The free flow of product will be interrupted. They might end up doing mini waterfall within their agile process. Many don’t even realize this. This results in poor quality and requires additional effort to “harden” the product. Potentially Shippable Product increment The acceptance criteria and DoD should be modified

The Agile School

Search This Blog