Skip to main content

ASP.net - implementing Asynchronous HTTP handler

Asynchronous programming has its own benefits. It helps in better usage of resources. In ASP.net when a user request for a resource which is to be processed by HTTP Handler a thread is created an allocated to the handler file. The thread will be idle till the file finish it’s processing. So as to minimize this “idle” period using asynchronous programming we can release the thread back to pool after passing the execution to handler file. When the asynchronous handler completes its work, the framework reassigns a thread to the original request and the handler can render content to the browser. For a better understanding of Asynchronous programming in .Net visit: Asynchronous Programming Overview

We can create an asynchronous HTTP handler by implementing the IHttpAsyncHandler interface, which is derived from the IHttpHandler interface. It adds two additional
methods:

  • IAsyncResult BeginProcessRequest(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb, object extraData);—Called to start the asynchronous task.
  • void EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult result)—Called when the asynchronous task completes

Create a new class like the following


    public class NewClass : IHttpAsyncHandler
    {
        private HttpContext _context;
        private WebRequest _request;

        public IAsyncResult BeginProcessRequest(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb, object extraData)
        {
        }

        public void EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult result)
        {
        }

        public bool IsReusable
        {
            get { return true; }
        }

        public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
        {
            throw new Exception("The ProcessRequest method is not implemented.");
        }
    }

You can use this class to do a variety of tasks.

In the below Code I have used created a clss to read RSS data from web

public class RSSHandler : IHttpAsyncHandler
    {
        private HttpContext _context;
        private WebRequest _request;
        public IAsyncResult BeginProcessRequest(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb, object extraData)
        {
            // Store context

            _context = context;
            // Initiate call to RSS feed
           
            _request = WebRequest.Create(context.Request.QueryString["rssURL"]);
            return _request.BeginGetResponse(cb, extraData);
        }
        public void EndProcessRequest(IAsyncResult result)
        {
            // Get the RSS feed
            string rss = String.Empty;
            WebResponse response = _request.EndGetResponse(result);
            using (response)
            {
                StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(response.GetResponseStream());
                rss = reader.ReadToEnd();
            }
            _context.Response.Write(rss);
        }
        public bool IsReusable
        {
            get { return true; }
        }
        public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
        {
            throw new Exception("The ProcessRequest method is not implemented.");
        }


This class will read the RSS feed asynchronously.

The BeginProcessRequest() method uses the WebRequest class to request the page that
contains the RSS headlines. It received the URL as QueryString.The WebRequest.BeginGetResponse() method is used to retrieve the remote page asynchronously. When the BeginGetResponse() method completes, the handler’s EndProcessRequest() method is called. This method retrieves the page and renders the contents of the page to the browser.

Before we start using this handler we have to register this handler like the following in web.config

<httpHandlers>
      <add verb="*" path="*.rss" validate="false" type="AspNet.RSSHandler"/>
                  <add verb="*" path="*.xml" validate="false" type="AspNet.RSSHandler"/>
 httpHandlers>

After building and typing the following URL

I got an output similar to the one shown below
There was no file xyz.rss or sample.xml but since these extensions were mapped to the recently created HTTP handler output was generated by the framework




Related Articles :

  1. ASP.net - Http handlers - implementing IHttpHandler
  2. ASP.net - Http handlers - Generic Hander 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PDCA & SCRUM (or Agile); Why is it important?

The PDCA (Plan DO Check Act) cycle was made popular by Dr. W. Edwards Deming. This is a scientific cyclic process which can be used to improve the process (or product). This is cyclic in nature and usually time boxed. Plan  This is the first stage of the process. During this step the team discusses the objectives, the process and the clear conditions of exit (conditions of acceptance). This stage sets the measurable and achievable goals for the team. DO Team works together to achieve the objective set in the planning phase. Team works with the set of agreed process. Check Once the implantation is done team regroups and verifies the output and compares it to the agreed conditions of acceptance decided during the planning phase. The deviation, if any, is noted down. ACT If any deviation in planned tasks is observed during the Check stage, a root cause analysis is conducted. Team brainstorms and identifies the changes required to prevent such deviations in future. Team also

Why is potentially shippable product quality important

Agile teams work in iterations. During this period, they are supposed to work on product increments which can be “delivered” at the end of iteration. But how you know that the correct product was delivered? Many teams have different kinds of acceptance criteria and Definition of Done (DoD). But in many cases, this “done” is not the real “done” there might be some testing pending, some integration or review pending or anything else which prevents the actual use of the product increment. Many of these teams will need additional iterations to finish hardening their products. Many teams will implement different types of “gates” or approval steps to move to next stage. The free flow of product will be interrupted. They might end up doing mini waterfall within their agile process. Many don’t even realize this. This results in poor quality and requires additional effort to “harden” the product. Potentially Shippable Product increment The acceptance criteria and DoD should be modified

Product Backlog: Should you write everything in user story format?

I like user stories a lot. They help everyone talk the same language and results in a better product. User story alone does not constitute product requirement. User story is supposed to be a place holder for discussion which should happen between the team, Product Owner and the customer. This discussion result in a common understanding which along with the user story content is the product requirement. This format captures the essence of requirement without confusing the readers User Story is only one of the many different ways in which requirements can be represented. This is not mandatory in any Agile “process”. But many have made this mandatory. I have seen many spending countless hours trying to write the requirements in user story format when they could have easily written that in simple one-line sentence in few minutes.   I have seen team members refusing to even discuss the requirement until product owner rewrote the requirement in user story format. Once I