Skip to main content

C# Thread Synchronization


Multithreading enables you to have several threads of execution running at the same time. But in this case there is a risk of one thread trying to access resource when another tread is working on the resource. In short they all compete for the same set of resources, so there must be a mechanism to ensure synchronization and communication among threads.

You can use the following ways to synchronize your threads:
  1. The Interlocked class

    // Summary:
    //     Provides atomic operations for variables that are shared by multiple threads.
    public static class Interlocked
    {
public static int Decrement(ref int location)
public static long Decrement(ref long location);
public static int Increment(ref int location);
        //
        // Summary:
        //     Increments a specified variable and stores the result, as an atomic operation.
        //
        // Parameters:
        //   location:
        //     The variable whose value is to be incremented.
        //
        // Returns:
        //     The incremented value.
        //
        // Exceptions:
        //   System.NullReferenceException:
        //     The address of location is a null pointer.
        public static long Increment(ref long location);
}


use can use the Interlocked class like the foloowing

        static int _inum = 0;
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
           
        }

        static void Add()
        {
            Interlocked.Increment(ref _inum);
        }
        static void Sub()
        {
            Interlocked.Decrement(ref _inum);
        }

Increment & Decrement are the main two functions of the class. Check out the documentation for other methods

  1. The C# lock keyword

Use this method to keep multiple statements Thread safe; to lock a block of code, give the lock statement an object as argument.

class Program
    {
        static int _inum = 0;
        static object _obj = new object();
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Thread tAdd = new Thread(Add)
            {
                Name = "Add thread"
            };
            tAdd.Start(1);
            Thread tSub = new Thread(new ParameterizedThreadStart(Program.Sub));
            tSub.Start(1);

            //Add(14);
            //Sub(10);
            Console.ReadLine();
           
        }

        static void Add(object _val)
        {
            int val = Convert.ToInt32(_val);
            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
            {
                lock (_obj)
                {
                    _inum += val;
                    Console.WriteLine("new value after add= " + _inum);
                    Console.WriteLine("current thread: {0}", Thread.CurrentThread.Name);
                    Console.WriteLine();
                }
            }
        }
        static void Sub(object _val)
        {
            int val = Convert.ToInt32(_val);
            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
            {
                lock (_obj)
                {
                    _inum -= val;
                    Console.WriteLine("new value after sub= " + _inum);
                }
            }
        }
    }




  1. The Monitor class

The limitation of the lock statement is that you do not have the capability to release the lock halfway through the critical section. This is important because there are situations in which one thread needs to release the lock so that other threads have a chance to proceed before the first thread can resume its execution.
    //     Provides a mechanism that synchronizes access to objects.
    [ComVisible(true)]
    public static class Monitor
    {
public static void Enter(object obj);
        //
        // Summary:
        //     Releases an exclusive lock on the specified object.
        //
        // Parameters:
        //   obj:
        //     The object on which to release the lock.
        //
        // Exceptions:
        //   System.ArgumentNullException:
        //     The obj parameter is null.
        //
        //   System.Threading.SynchronizationLockException:
        //     The current thread does not own the lock for the specified object.
        [ReliabilityContract(Consistency.WillNotCorruptState, Cer.Success)]
        public static void Exit(object obj);
        //
        // Summary:
        //     Notifies a thread in the waiting queue of a change in the locked object's
        //     state.
        //
        // Parameters:
        //   obj:
        //     The object a thread is waiting for.
        //
        // Exceptions:
        //   System.ArgumentNullException:
        //     The obj parameter is null.
        //
        //   System.Threading.SynchronizationLockException:
        //     The calling thread does not own the lock for the specified object.
        public static void Pulse(object obj);
        //
        // Summary:
        //     Notifies all waiting threads of a change in the object's state.
        //
        // Parameters:
        //   obj:
        //     The object that sends the pulse.
        //
        // Exceptions:
        //   System.ArgumentNullException:
        //     The obj parameter is null.
        //
        //   System.Threading.SynchronizationLockException:
        //     The calling thread does not own the lock for the specified object.
        public static void PulseAll(object obj);
}

In the previous example the value of inum can be less than 0 but with lock statement I couldn’t prevent/stop the thread from doing this so but with Monitor class I can set such conditions & check for other similar business conditions.

The Add & Sub methods can be re-written like the following using the Monitor class

        static void Add(object _val)
        {
            int val = Convert.ToInt32(_val);
            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
            {
                Monitor.Enter(_obj);
                _inum += val;
                Console.WriteLine("new value after add= " + _inum);
                Console.WriteLine("current thread: {0}", Thread.CurrentThread.Name);
                Console.WriteLine();
                Monitor.Exit(_obj);
            }

        }
        static void Sub(object _val)
        {
            int val = Convert.ToInt32(_val);
            for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
            {
                Monitor.Enter(_obj);
                _inum -= val;
                if (_inum < 1)
                    Monitor.Pulse(_obj);
                Console.WriteLine("new value after sub= " + _inum);
                Monitor.Exit(_obj);
            }
        }

The Enter() method of the Monitor class acquires a lock on the specified object, and the Exit()
method releases the lock. The code enclosed by the Enter() and Exit() methods is the critical section. The Pulse() method of the Monitor sends a signal to the waiting thread that the lock is now released and is now going to pass back to it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PDCA & SCRUM (or Agile); Why is it important?

The PDCA (Plan DO Check Act) cycle was made popular by Dr. W. Edwards Deming. This is a scientific cyclic process which can be used to improve the process (or product). This is cyclic in nature and usually time boxed. Plan  This is the first stage of the process. During this step the team discusses the objectives, the process and the clear conditions of exit (conditions of acceptance). This stage sets the measurable and achievable goals for the team. DO Team works together to achieve the objective set in the planning phase. Team works with the set of agreed process. Check Once the implantation is done team regroups and verifies the output and compares it to the agreed conditions of acceptance decided during the planning phase. The deviation, if any, is noted down. ACT If any deviation in planned tasks is observed during the Check stage, a root cause analysis is conducted. Team brainstorms and identifies the changes required to prevent such deviations in future. Team also

SCRUM- Who should write a user story

Traditionally user stories (or requirements) were written by Business analysts. They used to prepare big documents after months of study. It was a herculean task. I used to get such UI/Functional specification documents. I have fixed a lot of bugs because I missed few text in such 1000 + pages document. This is not the only interesting part. Some of the requirements were so weird that I often wondered why I am creating the features which no one is going to use. If I had the option I would have recommended a better option. If the BA’s misunderstood some requirements & customers failed to correct those few words in the epic requirement then we will have a nice situation. In the agile world the story is different. Product Owners are primarily responsible for user stories. But can anyone else also contribute? Yes. Definitely yes In actual environment many users write user stories. The first requirement may come from end user. The PO, tech architect, scrum master, BA’s... anyone can up

Why is potentially shippable product quality important

Agile teams work in iterations. During this period, they are supposed to work on product increments which can be “delivered” at the end of iteration. But how you know that the correct product was delivered? Many teams have different kinds of acceptance criteria and Definition of Done (DoD). But in many cases, this “done” is not the real “done” there might be some testing pending, some integration or review pending or anything else which prevents the actual use of the product increment. Many of these teams will need additional iterations to finish hardening their products. Many teams will implement different types of “gates” or approval steps to move to next stage. The free flow of product will be interrupted. They might end up doing mini waterfall within their agile process. Many don’t even realize this. This results in poor quality and requires additional effort to “harden” the product. Potentially Shippable Product increment The acceptance criteria and DoD should be modified