Skip to main content

WCF 8192 issue

This was a simple issue which baffled few brains in my project. For the past few weeks i was seeing the mails about this. What was the exact problem?
 Whenever a large xml stream is passed through WCF it generated the following error. Everything was fins at the ASP.net client side. Almost all the known properties of
 
Problem:
The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader.

Cause: 
By default WCF allows a string content of size 8192 (8K) to pass through without any problems. If the size increases above this set limit WCF treats the incoming message as bad message & hence throws an exception. This level was set considering the security aspect of distributed system.

If we have to pass more data we will have to manually override this default setting.

Now here the trick. Everyone looked at the client side but there is a server part also :)

When a WCF client is created  automatically all the properties required to run that service is added by default by visual studio.



Changes made in WCF server applications web.config :
Added a new HTTPbinding 
    <bindings>
      <wsHttpBinding>
        <binding name="newHTTPBinding" maxBufferPoolSize="2147483647"maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647">
          <readerQuotas maxDepth="32" maxStringContentLength="2147483647"
            maxArrayLength="16384" maxBytesPerRead="4096"maxNameTableCharCount="16384" />
        binding>
      wsHttpBinding>
    bindings>

set the value for maxBufferPoolSize, maxReceivedMessageSize,maxStringContentLength

for the HTTPEndpoint i created a new binding configuration and mapped it

<endpoint bindingConfiguration="newHTTPBinding" address="" binding="wsHttpBinding"contract="Abhi.AbhiBiz.IContractBusiness">

After this binding the WCF endpoint will take the new properties and allow more characters through the endpoint

Stringcontent was given a higher value at client- presentation layer but the same configuration was not given in WCF service-endpoint at the business layer.

Security issue : 

2147483647 is the magical figure but most of the applications doesn't need this much data.If not tested properly this configuration can lead to DOS attacks.
We need a realistic figure which matches the datatransfer between the endpoints. BufferSize also should be monitored to check the memory consumption



WCF de-serializes the object passed between endpoints, so if an object of 500 KB is passed the de-serilized data will be much higher. Further complexity can arise if an array of object is passed. So a realistic value for maxBufferPoolSize, maxReceivedMessageSize,maxStringContentLength should be given.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SCRUM- Who should write a user story

Traditionally user stories (or requirements) were written by Business analysts. They used to prepare big documents after months of study. It was a herculean task. I used to get such UI/Functional specification documents. I have fixed a lot of bugs because I missed few text in such 1000 + pages document. This is not the only interesting part. Some of the requirements were so weird that I often wondered why I am creating the features which no one is going to use. If I had the option I would have recommended a better option. If the BA’s misunderstood some requirements & customers failed to correct those few words in the epic requirement then we will have a nice situation. In the agile world the story is different. Product Owners are primarily responsible for user stories. But can anyone else also contribute? Yes. Definitely yes In actual environment many users write user stories. The first requirement may come from end user. The PO, tech architect, scrum master, BA’s... anyone can up

What are the rules of scrum?

A relatively new person to scrum asked me this question last day. My answer to that person was yes. But really does the scrum have any rules? Scrum is a framework which helps us in developing software. It has very few rules and apart from those basic rules rest of them are guidelines like best practices. Some of the rules  The roles of Scrum • Scrum Master -  http://www.theagileschool.com/2012/03/scrummasters-checklist-roles.html • Product Owner • Feature Team The PDCA cycle ( http://www.theagileschool.com/2012/05/pdca-scrum-or-agile-why-is-it-important.html  )  frequent communication about risks (daily) • Plan – Sprint planning • Do – Actual engineering sprint – deliver a potential shippable code • Check – Sprint review • Act – Retrospective  The scrum guide @ http://www.scrum.org/Scrum-Guides will be a good guideline for teams/companies planning to start scrum. If you are following the recommendation in these then you are following scrum. Apart from these rest of

Product Backlog: Should you write everything in user story format?

I like user stories a lot. They help everyone talk the same language and results in a better product. User story alone does not constitute product requirement. User story is supposed to be a place holder for discussion which should happen between the team, Product Owner and the customer. This discussion result in a common understanding which along with the user story content is the product requirement. This format captures the essence of requirement without confusing the readers User Story is only one of the many different ways in which requirements can be represented. This is not mandatory in any Agile “process”. But many have made this mandatory. I have seen many spending countless hours trying to write the requirements in user story format when they could have easily written that in simple one-line sentence in few minutes.   I have seen team members refusing to even discuss the requirement until product owner rewrote the requirement in user story format. Once I